Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Service Organic Farming

Home About MOSES Events Calendar Donate Now News MOSES Staff

Google

Search WWW
Search mosesorganic.org
ORGANIC NEWSBREAKS
Covering important organic farming news.
Click on the links below to view each article.
beef

December 2007 Michigan Research: Organic Can Feed the World

October 2007 Understanding Laws that Prohibit GMOs in Organic Farming
October 2007 Farm Fresh Atlas - Wisconsin
September 2007 Organic Cost Share Available - MN Dept of Agriculture
September 2007 Genetically Engineered Alfalfa Hotline
September 2007 Wisconsin Eat Local Challenge
July 2007 Study: Organic Dairy and Meat Improves Quality of Mother's Breast Milk
July 2007 Who Owns Organics?
June 2007 UWRF awarded USDA grant for Sustainable Agriculture Program
June 2007 Open Letter to the Organic Food Community
May 2007 Arizona Prohibits Mandatory Animal ID
May 2007 Federal Judge Orders First-Ever Halt to Planting of a Commerialized Genetically Altered Crop
April 2007 Michael Pollan: The 2007 Farm Bill 'You Are What You Grow'
April 2007 Organic Milk Supply Expected to Surge as Farmers Pursue a Payoff
April 2007 FoodNews.org Releases Pesticides on Produce Guide
April 2007 Is Organic Food Worth It?
March 2007 New Booklet to Help Farmers Understand Farmers’ Market Rules
March 2007 2006 the Status of Organic Agriculture in Minnesota Released
March 2007 Statement of Francis Thicke to the U.S. Senate Committee
March 2007 Are GM Crops Killing Bees?
March 2007 IA State University Dining Services Solicits Local Growers
March 2007 Web Site Service For Small Farms
March 2007 Collaborative Regional Alliance for Farmer Training (CRAFT) Releases 2006 Annual Report
Feb 2007 Blowing the whistle on sham 'organics'
Feb 2007 Federal Court Halts New Field Trials of Genetically Engineered Crops
Feb 2007 Secretary Nilsestuen Announces Wisconsin Organic Agriculture Advisory Council
Feb 2007 IFOAM Internet Training Platform Launched
Dec 2006 ERS Report on Organic Poultry and Eggs: A New USDA Economic Research Service Report
Sept 2006 Organic Demand Outstrips Supply
July 2006 Long Overdue: Tax Breaks for Farmers Who Shift to Organic Agriculture
July 2006 Announcing Directory of Minnesota Organic Farms
May 2006 2006 CSA Farm Directory Available
March 2006 New study confirms the ecological virtues of organic farming
March 2006 Reduced nitrate leaching and enhanced denitrifier activity and efficiency in organically fertilized soils
Feb 2006 Organic Agriculture in Wisconsin 2005 Status Report
Feb 2006 New Report Assesses World of Organic Agriculture
Feb 2006 Wisconsin Schools Receive $1 Million for Fresh Fruit & Vegetables USDA seeking producers interested in selling to schools!
Dec 2005 SARE Grants for Producers
Dec 2005 Antibiotic Uptake by Plants from Soil Fertilized with Animal Manure
Oct 2005 New Report: Grower to Grower: Creating a Livelyhood on a Fresh Market Vegetable Farm
Aug 2005 Report: From Barn to Banquet Opportunities and Barriers to Greater Use of Minnesota Grown Food at Conferences
June 2004 Eating Fresh Publications presents a new 12-page color booklet The Great News about Grass
April 2004 Farm Program is Sown, but Will it Survive? Conservation Security Program
Oct 2003 Organic Farming Combats Global Warming ... Big Time
Sept 2003 CIAS Report Cover Crops on the Intensive Market Farm

Keep up with upcoming EVENTS.

Top


Wisconsin Research Shows that Organic Farming is as Productive as Conventional and that Weeds and Weather Matter

The Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trials (WICST) have produced a series of important findings. The latest focuses on the productivity of organic corn-soybean systems and concludes that organic farms can be essentially as productive as nearby conventional farms.
Organic corn and soybean yields were on average 90% of conventional yields, and organic forage crop yields were the same as conventional yields. In years where organic farmers could carry out early-season weed control on a timely basis, corn and soybean yields were the same.
In years with wet weather in the spring, however, organic yields can suffer when mechanical cultivation of weeds is delayed. But in dry years, organically managed crops often yield higher than conventional crops because of the ability of soils on organic farms to more quickly take in rainfall.
It is worth noting that the approximate 10% lower corn and soybean yields on organic farms likely results in 15% to 25% higher concentrations of protein, some vitamins, and overall antioxidant activity. The increase in nutrient density likely more than makes up fully for the modest yield reduction.
Part of the increase in organic corn and soybean nutrient density is directly linked to lower yields and the "dilution effect" (see the "Still No Free Lunch" report for a detailed discussion), with the balance of the difference attributed to the ability of soils on organic farms to increase flavonoid and antioxidant levels.

Source: J.L. Posner et al., "Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping System Trials: I. Productivity 1900-2002," Agronomy Journal, Vol. 100, No. 2, 2008

Organic Cost Share again offered by MDA

September 2007 - St. Paul, MN. Organic farmers and processors can receive a partial rebate for the cost of organic certification through a Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) program. The MDA is now accepting applications for organic certification cost-share payments. All applications must be postmarked by November 15, 2007. See the MDA website for an application packet or call Meg Moynihan (651) 201-6616 for more information.


Genetically Engineered Alfalfa Hotline - NEW!!

September 2007

USDA is providing a list of states and counties in which Roundup Ready alfalfa is grown as part of a court order which vacated USDA's 2005 decision to deregulate Roundup Ready Alfalfa. View a list of Roundup Ready alfalfa locations in the United States at www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/alfalfa_locations.shtml. APHIS has also made available a toll-free telephone number for use by conventional and organic alfalfa farmers and prospective alfalfa farmers to inquire about the proximity of their farms or fields to Roundup Ready Alfalfa. Callers must comply with the following two requirements: * Callers must be a person who either currently plants conventional or organic alfalfa or plans to do so. * Calls must be ready to provide the operator with either the latitude and longitude coordinates or the mailing address of their farm or field where the alfalfa is or will be grown. Other types of location information cannot be accepted, and only one location from each caller per phone call will be accepted. Call 1-866-724-6408 for more details on GE alfalfa locations. An operator will be availalble beginning August 6, 2007 from 9 am to 5 pm eastern time, Monday through Friday (except holidays).

Top


Arizona Prohibits Mandatory Animal ID

May 2007

Arizona became the first state in the nation to prohibit mandatory participation in a National Animal Identification System. The NAIS was first proposed by USDA as a mandatory program to begin in 2007. Opposition from livestock owners forced officials to redesign the program as "voluntary at the federal level," while continuing to fund mandatory and coercive state programs. USAgNet reports at least a dozen other states are considering legislation to block efforts by both state and federal government to require livestock animal owners to participate in the NAIS. Full Article

Related ATTRA Publication: The National Animal Identification System (NAIS): What it is, and how to participate in the process

Top


FEDERAL JUDGE ORDERS FIRST-EVER HALT TO PLANTING OF A COMMERCIALIZED GENETICALLY-ALTERED CROP

May 3, 2007, San Francisco, CA,

Judge Breyer Orders Complete Environmental Review of Monsanto's Gene-Altered Alfalfa 

- A Federal judge today made a final ruling that the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDAs) 2005 approval of Monsanto's genetically engineered (GE) "Roundup Ready" alfalfa was illegal.  The Judge called on USDA to ban any further planting of the GE seed until it conducts a complete Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the GE crop.

In the decision, Judge Charles Breyer in the Federal Northern District of California affirmed his preliminary ruling, which echoed the Center for Food Safety's arguments in their lawsuit against USDA, that the crop could harm the environment and contaminate natural alfalfa. Today's ruling also requires Forage Genetics to provide the locations of all existing Roundup Ready alfalfa plots to USDA within 30 days.  The Judge ordered USDA to make the location of these plots "publicly available as soon as practicable" so that growers of organic and conventional alfalfa "can test their own crops to determine if there has been contamination."

"This permanent halt to the planting of this risky crop is a great victory for the environment," said Will Rostov, a Senior Attorney for CFS. "Roundup Ready alfalfa poses threats to farmers, to our export markets, and to the environment. We expect the USDA to abide by the law and insure that American farmers are protected from genetic contamination."

Today's decision is consistent with Judge Breyer's ruling of February 13th, in which Judge Breyer found that the USDA failed to address concerns that Roundup Ready alfalfa will contaminate conventional and organic alfalfa. In calling today for a permanent injunction, Judge Breyer noted that contamination of natural and organic alfalfa by the GE variety has already occurred, and noted that "Such contamination is irreparable environmental harm. The contamination cannot be undone."

"This ruling is good news for organic farmers and most conventional farmers across the country," said Andrew Kimbrell, Executive Director of the Center. "This crop represents a very real threat to their crops and their livelihood.  This ruling is a turning point in the regulation of biotech crops in this country," Kimbrell concluded. Full Article

Top


Michael Pollan: The 2007 Farm Bill 'You Are What You Grow'

April 19, 2007, By Michael Pollan, Sustainable Food News
Straight to the Source Click here to subscribe to the Sustainable Food News.

Michael Pollan, a contributing writer, is the Knight professor of journalism at the University of California, Berkeley. His most recent book is "The Omnivore's Dilemma," which was named one of the 10 best books of 2006 by The New York Times Book Review, The Washington Post and Amazon.com.

A few years ago, an obesity researcher at the University of Washington named Adam Drewnowski ventured into the supermarket to solve a mystery.

He wanted to figure out why it is that the most reliable predictor of obesity in America today is a person's wealth. For most of history, after all, the poor have typically suffered from a shortage of calories, not a surfeit. So how is it that today the people with the least amount of money to spend on food are the ones most likely to be overweight?

Drewnowski gave himself a hypothetical dollar to spend, using it to purchase as many calories as he possibly could. He discovered that he could buy the most calories per dollar in the middle aisles of the supermarket, among the towering canyons of processed food and soft drink. (In the typical American supermarket, the fresh foods - dairy, meat, fish and produce - line the perimeter walls, while the imperishable packaged goods dominate the center.)

Drewnowski found that a dollar could buy 1,200 calories of cookies or potato chips but only 250 calories of carrots. Looking for something to wash down those chips, he discovered that his dollar bought 875 calories of soda but only 170 calories of orange juice.

As a rule, processed foods are more "energy dense" than fresh foods: they contain less water and fiber but more added fat and sugar, which makes them both less filling and more fattening. These particular calories also happen to be the least healthful ones in the marketplace, which is why we call the foods that contain them "junk."

Drewnowski concluded that the rules of the food game in America are organized in such a way that if you are eating on a budget, the most rational economic strategy is to eat badly - and get fat.

This perverse state of affairs is not, as you might think, the inevitable result of the free market. Compared with a bunch of carrots, a package of Twinkies, to take one iconic processed foodlike substance as an example, is a highly complicated, high-tech piece of manufacture, involving no fewer than 39 ingredients, many themselves elaborately manufactured, as well as the packaging and a hefty marketing budget. Full Article

Top


Organic Milk Supply Expected to Surge as Farmers Pursue a Payoff

April 20, 2007 By ANDREW MARTIN, New York Times

Dairy farmers are rushing to convert to organic milk production, and it is largely because of a blueberry farmer who lives in Maine with a solar-powered computer and an outhouse outfitted with a stained-glass window. Edward Walldroff said he had saved money on feeding his cows by converting to organic farming before more stringent rules begin in June. Demand for organic milk has been growing 20 percent or more a year.

Arthur Harvey, the blueberry farmer, persuaded a federal court in 2005 that some regulations on organic milk were too lax, including those governing how a dairy farmer can convert to organic status.

As a result, hundreds of dairy farmers decided to switch last spring so they could complete the yearlong conversion before the more stringent “Harvey” rule takes effect in June.

“When this court case was decided, we said, ‘Now’s the time for us. Let’s do it,’ ” said Edward Walldroff, a farmer in La Fargeville, N.Y., who said that five other dairy farmers nearby were doing the same thing. “It’s really kind of exciting to see that happen, and know that six smaller-type farmers have some real viability now.”

On a larger scale, Organic Valley, a cooperative based in Wisconsin that sells dairy products, is adding 269 farmers this year for a total of 972; it will process 45 percent more milk this spring than a year earlier.

Horizon Organic, the biggest organic dairy company in the country, added 64 organic dairy farmers in 2006 for a total of about 350, and about 230 more are in transition, said Sara Unrue, a spokeswoman.

“It looks like we will have a serious oversupply in the next two months,” said George Siemon, Organic Valley’s chief executive. “We are now telling people, ‘Please stop thinking that there is a bottomless market.’ ” Full Article

Top


FoodNews.org releases Pesticides on Produce Guide
April 2007

Why Should You Care About Pesticides?
There is growing consensus in the scientific community that small doses of pesticides and other chemicals can adversely affect people, especially during vulnerable periods of fetal development and childhood when exposures can have long lasting effects. Because the toxic effects of pesticides are worrisome, not well understood, or in some cases completely unstudied, shoppers are wise to minimize exposure to pesticides whenever possible.

Will Washing and Peeling Help?
Nearly all of the data used to create these lists already considers how people typically wash and prepare produce (for example, apples are washed before testing, bananas are peeled). While washing and rinsing fresh produce may reduce levels of some pesticides, it does not eliminate them. Peeling also reduces exposures, but valuable nutrients often go down the drain with the peel. The best option is to eat a varied diet, wash all produce, and choose organic when possible to reduce exposure to potentially harmful chemicals.

How This Guide Was Developed
The produce ranking was developed by analysts at the not-for-profit Environmental Working Group (EWG) based on the results of nearly 43,000 tests for pesticides on produce collected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration between 2000 and 2004. A detailed description of the criteria used in developing the rankings is available as well as a full list of fresh fruits and vegetables that have been tested (see below). EWG is a not-for-profit environmental research organization dedicated to improving public health and protecting the environment by reducing pollution in air, water and food. Link to Get the Guide For more information please visit www.ewg.org

Top


IS ORGANIC FOOD WORTH IT?
April 2007 by Sheryl Eisenberg

Several readers have written in recently asking how to make a case for organic food to skeptical friends and family members. As Pam Fagan of Greenwood, South Carolina, put it:

I try to encourage people to buy organic foods when they are available. One excuse I often hear is that they cost more and "I can't spend a penny more for groceries." I also hear "What I do is not going to make enough difference to matter." I was also told by one person that their spouse read that everything that was labeled "organic" was not necessarily so. Is that true and, if so, how does a person know if something really is organically grown?

These seem like such common objections, I thought I'd create the following FAQ to address them and other questions:

1) How can you be sure that food labeled "organic" really is organic?
Use of the term is regulated by the United States Department of Agriculture. In order to put the word "organic" on a food label, the grower or producer must get the product certified as organic by a USDA-accredited certifier. Those who knowingly label or sell non-organic products as "organic" can be fined up to $11,000 for each violation.

2) What exactly does "organic" mean?
On a food label, "organic" means the food was produced without synthetic pesticides or fertilizers, sewage sludge, genetic engineering or irradiation. In the case of animal products, it additionally means the animal received no antibiotics or hormones and was fed organic feed containing no animal by-products. An organic label also means animals had access to the outdoors, though "access" is not defined in a meaningful way, which makes this the weakest provision of the regulations.

3) Are some foods with an "organic" label more organic than others?
Yes, among processed foods with multiple ingredients, those displaying the USDA organic seal -- and/or called "organic" on the front label -- have the most organic content: at least 95 percent. Those labeled "made with organic ingredients" on the front may be as little as 70 percent organic. (The latter cannot display the USDA's organic seal, but may display the logo of the certifying agent.)

4) Is organic food better for the environment?
Yes. By eliminating massive quantities of toxic pesticides and synthetic fertilizers used in conventional farming, organic methods help protect the health of our air, water and soil. Another benefit of organic food is that it does not add to the problem of antibiotic resistance -- which makes antibiotics ineffective for treating illness -- because antibiotic use in organically-raised animals is not allowed.

5) Is organic food safer for you to eat?
Yes. Unlike conventionally produced food, organic food exposes you to no synthetic pesticides or growth hormones. Many of these substances have been proven to cause cancer, birth defects and damage to the nervous and reproductive systems in animal studies, though at higher levels than commonly found in food. What has not been studied is whether exposure to low levels of these substances, individually or in combination -- as happens in the real world as distinct from the lab -- also has adverse health effects. In the absence of this information, the safest course is not to expose yourself to chemicals designed and proven to kill other forms of life. This is especially true for children, as their developing nervous and endocrine systems put them at much greater risk of harm than adults. Full Article

Top


New Booklet to Help Farmers Understand Farmers’ Market Rules
March, 2007
Contact: Jill Krueger – 651-223-5400 or jkrueger@flaginc.org

ST. PAUL, MINN. — Farmers’ Legal Action Group, Inc. (FLAG) announces a new booklet, Understanding Farmers’ Market Rules. The booklet contains important legal information for farmers who sell their vegetables, fruits, flowers, meats, and other foods at farmers’ markets. FLAG wrote the booklet to help answer questions it received from farmers. Farmers’ markets are especially popular among beginning farmers, immigrant farmers, specialty crop farmers, and limited resource farmers. Many farmers who are interested in direct marketing and value-added agriculture begin by selling at farmers’ markets. Because farmers’ markets appeal to new farmers and to farmers with little direct marketing experience, there is a greater need for information for farmers to turn to when they have questions.

The booklet is intended to help farmers understand their responsibilities and rights as farmers’ market vendors. FLAG attorney Jill Krueger notes that, “Even though the details of the rules may be different from market to market, there are a few commonly used rules of the market that most often give rise to misunderstandings.” The focus of the booklet is on preventing problems by improving understanding of market rules. But the booklet offers practical suggestions farmers can follow to try to resolve any problems that may arise. It also gives ideas on how to learn about other requirements that may apply to sales at a farmers’ market. In addition to market rules, a market vendor’s rights and responsibilities may also be governed by federal, state, and local laws.

A free copy of the article can be requested by calling FLAG’s office at 651-223-5400.  Minnesota callers may dial FLAG’s office at 1-877-860-4349.  The article can be also downloaded from FLAG’s website at: www.flaginc.org.

FLAG is a nonprofit law center in St. Paul, Minnesota, dedicated to providing legal services to family farmers and their rural communities in order to help keep family farmers on the land.

Top


2006 the Status of Organic Agriculture in Minnesota
March 2007

Executive Summary

Purpose of Report
The Minnesota Department of Agriculture, in conjunction with its Organic Advisory Task Force,
is directed to report to the Legislature on the status of organic agriculture in Minnesota.
Minnesota Statutes §31.92 – 31.94 concern organic agriculture. These are available on the world
wide web at: www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us

Organic Production and Market Trends
The number of certified organic farms and acres in Minnesota continues to grow, along with
domestic and international market demand for organic food. Retail sales of organic food are
strong, and averaged just over 18 percent per year between 1997 and 2005 and are driving
demand for organic farm products. Consumer interest in organic products is driving demand for
raw organic farm products and ingredients. The market is experiencing concentration; a number
of large food corporations have purchased established organic brands. Some food companies have
introduced organic versions of their existing lines. Industry experts predict the consumer market
will continue to grow. All organic categories are expected to continue strong sales growth,
particularly meat, poultry, and fish. Pressure from low-cost imports is likely to negatively affect
Minnesota producers.

Minnesota had more than 525 certified organic farms in 2006 and with slightly more than
129,000 certified organic acres as of 2005, the last year for which acreage estimates are available.
Certified acres in Minnesota grew by 57 percent between 2000 and 2005. The state continues its
number one position in organic corn and soybean acres and holds the number seven spot for
organic dairy cows. It ranks in the top five for six additional crop and livestock categories.

Human Health and Environmental Considerations
A number of applied research studies have found that organic farms are profitable, even when
organic premiums are halved or eliminated. Long term studies are also finding that organic yields
may meet or exceed conventional yields. Results of studies comparing the nutritional value of
organic food vs. non-organic food are inconclusive, although there is evidence that antioxidant
levels may be higher in organic foods. The results of two studies examining children’s diets
suggest that eating organic food may reduce exposure to pesticides that are metabolized by
humans. Researchers are documenting and quantifying conservation and environmental benefits
of organic production systems.

Grower Perceptions
By and large, organic growers express optimism about the future of agriculture. In a survey of
organic growers conducted in 2004, almost three quarters of the 146 respondents said they
thought organic farming was more profitable than conventional agriculture and three quarters
expected that they or a family member would still be farming in 20 years. Fully 55 percent of
these farmers were age 50 or younger. Although they have a positive outlook, they have
encountered production challenges including weed management, pollen drift from genetically
modified crops, soybean aphid, and availability of local processing, particularly for meat.
Farmers’ top research needs are effective weed management strategies, soil fertility, soil
health/biology, variety selections, and pest management strategies for organic production. A
separate survey of dairy farmers found that around 44 percent had at least some interest in organic
dairy production. Their major concerns were livestock health, feed, and profitability.

The Minnesota Department of Agriculture serves organic growers and associated businesses with
a variety of programs including organic certification cost share, conferences, workshops,
directories, referrals, and farm management programs. Some of these services are delivered by
the department alone; others are undertaken in collaboration with the University of Minnesota,
nonprofit and farm organizations, and federal agencies. The United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) has contributed financial support to a number of organic projects. A
Memorandum of Understanding on Organic Agriculture exists and has been signed by the
Minnesota Department of Agriculture, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS),
Farm Service Agency, University of Minnesota Extension, and University of Minnesota College
of Food, Agriculture and Natural Resource Sciences.

A number of USDA agencies offer organic agriculture programs. In Minnesota, the NRCS offers
a per-acre organic transition cost share payment through its Environmental Quality Incentives
Program and underwrites several organic educational events each year. Some of the technical
assistance NRCS offers to farmers—such as the Web Soil Survey and a number of Tech Notes—
are particularly well-suited to organic producers. Resource Conservation and Development
Councils have explored collaborative marketing and promotional efforts for organic growers. The
Risk Management Agency has funded organic research and projects, as has the Cooperative State
Research, Education and Extension Service, particularly through the Sustainable Agriculture
Research and Education (SARE) Program. The Economic Research Service collects and
publishes organic acreage and market data that allow states like Minnesota to track adoption and
trends.

University of Minnesota faculty members have been engaged in applied organic research for well
over a decade. They teach courses on organic agriculture and conduct both small plot and on-farm
organic research in areas such as soil quality, food safety, weed management, and livestock
nutrition. A number of University of Minnesota Extension Educators throughout the state have
conducted crop variety trials, organized educational and outreach events, and delivered technical
assistance to organic and transitional growers.

Recommendations
With input from the Organic Advisory Task Force as well as stakeholders and peer agencies the
MDA recommends the following:

New Policies or Programs
• Technical and financial assistance to help growers during their transition to organic.
• A voluntary registration and affidavit program to provide state documentation to organic
growers who are legally exempt from certification requirements under §205.101 of the National
Organic Standards (7 C.F.R., Part 205).
• Organic educational materials and presentations for consumers.
• A Minnesota organic buyer directory (processors, brokers, shippers, traders, etc.).
Policies or Programs to Continue or Enhance
• State assistance to defray the cost of certification for certified organic Minnesota farmers and
processors.
• Information and technical assistance to help farmers learn about certification requirements,
organic practices, and resources available to them.
• Information and technical assistance help organic farmers understand, evaluate, and implement
marketing options.
• Assistance to farmer groups to help them evaluate and pursue value-added organic business
opportunities.
• Minnesota Organic Conference.
• Low-interest loans to organic farmers through the Shared Savings Loan Program administered
by MDA.
• Directory of Minnesota Organic Farms.
• Enforcement of Minnesota state labeling law with regard to organic product claims.
• Farmer-to-farmer networking programs.
• Collaboration, networking, and complementary efforts by federal, state, university, and nonprofit
stakeholders.
• Learning from efforts and experiences in other states.
• Expansion of the current five-partner Memorandum of Understanding on Organic Agriculture.

Current and Future Research Needs
Assess the current organic processing capacity for organic crops and livestock produced in
Minnesota and identify opportunities for, major barriers to, and recommendations concerning the
expansion of organic production and processing infrastructures in Minnesota and concomitant
economic development impact.

Increase long-term applied organic cropping systems and organic livestock production research
by faculty at the University of Minnesota and other post-secondary institutions on topics of
importance to Minnesota organic farmers such as: agronomics; soil quality and health; organic
crop variety development; composting; compost tea; weed, disease, and insect pest management;
economics; food safety and quality; farmer and farm worker safety; and management of flies and
parasites. Full Report (PDF 53 pages)

Please direct questions about this report or requests for additional copies to:
Meg Moynihan, Agricultural Resources Management and Development Division
Minnesota Department of Agriculture, 625 Robert Street North, St. Paul, MN 55155
651-201-6616 or meg.moynihan@state.mn.us
This report is also available at the Minnesota Department of Agriculture Website
www.mda.state.mn.us

Top


STATEMENT OF FRANCIS THICKE to the U.S. SENATE COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION AND FORESTRY
March 7, 2007, at the hearing on Investing in Our Nation’s Future through Agricultural Research
Good morning Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee. Thank you for this opportunity
to testify on agricultural research, education and extension investments and the 2007 Farm Bill.
My name is Francis Thicke and I am a farmer from Fairfield in Southeast Iowa. My wife,
Susan, and I own and operate an organic, grass-based dairy farm where we process our milk on the farm and market fluid milk, yogurt and cheese through local grocery stores and restaurants. The rotational grazing based farm is managed organically to improve soil life as well as plant and livestock diversity.

I hold an MS in soil science from the University of Minnesota and a PhD in agronomy from the
University of Illinois and worked in Washington D.C. as the National Program Leader for soil
science for the USDA-Extension Service before moving to Iowa to start the dairy farm. In
addition, I have worked with the Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Service, the
Scientific Congress on Organic Agriculture Research, and the Iowa Food Policy Council. I am
currently a member of the USDA’s NRCS State Technical Committee for Iowa and the Iowa
Environmental Protection Commission. I am a member of Practical Farmers of Iowa and serve
on the Board of the Organic Farming Research Foundation. I was in Washington just a week
ago as a reviewer on the technical review committee for USDA’s Integrated Organic research
program.

The research title of the farm bill is no doubt not the most talked about subject when Congress
turns its attention to the renewal of basic farm legislation. But it is our research policies and our investment in research, education and extension programs that perhaps most profoundly, over
the long term, help determine what kinds of farms and rural communities we will have in the
future. If we want thriving, widely dispersed family farms and vibrant farm communities,
research policy needs to explicitly serve that objective. Research policies and investments also
help determine whether we solve today’s pressing agro-environmental and rural economic
problems or whether we fail to do so. Research policies and investments help determine
whether we can create a sustainable system of agriculturally-based energy production and
conservation, or whether our energy needs will lead to destructive agricultural practices.
Research policies and investments help determine whether revitalized local and regional food
systems that promote healthy farms, healthy food, and healthy communities will take hold or
grow.

No doubt everyone testifying today agrees that food, agricultural and rural research must be placed much higher on the national agenda and that long-stagnated federal funding levels need a major shot in the arm. The rate of return to publicly supported agricultural research is very high. If publicly supported research aligns itself with high ranking and widely supported public benefits – nutritional needs, environmental enhancement, new and increased farming
opportunities, a growing rural economy and improving quality of life, contributions to slowing
global warming, and so on – the future for increased public investment could be bright. In that
light, I would like to address several key issues for the coming farm bill.

Initiative for Future Agriculture and Food Systems
The Agricultural Research, Extension and Education Reform Act of 1998 provided the USDA’s
Cooperative State Research Education and Extension Service (CSREES) with mandatory
spending authority of $120 million a year for five years to establish an Initiative for Future
Agriculture and Food Systems (IFAFS). IFAFS provided competitive grants to address
numerous current and emerging farm and food issues, with a focus on family farm and ranch
profitability, environmental performance of farming systems and natural resource management, and improvements in future food production systems including food safety, technology and human nutrition. Congress placed special emphasis on research to improve the viability and competitiveness of small- and medium-sized dairy, livestock, crop and other commodity operations. The 2002 Farm Bill increased IFAFS mandatory funding levels to $200 million and added rural economic and community development to the list of IFAFS program emphases. Entire Statement (pdf 8 pages)

Top


Are GM Crops Killing Bees?
March 2007, by Gunther Latsch

A mysterious decimation of bee populations has German beekeepers worried, while a similar phenomenon in the United States is gradually assuming catastrophic proportions. The consequences for agriculture and the economy could be enormous. Is the mysterous decimation of bee populations in the US and Germany a result of GM crops? Zoom DDP Is the mysterous decimation of bee populations in the US and Germany a result of GM crops? Walter Haefeker is a man who is used to painting grim scenarios. He sits on the board of directors of the German Beekeepers Association (DBIB) and is vice president of the European Professional Beekeepers Association. And because griping is part of a lobbyist's trade, it is practically his professional duty to warn that "the very existence of beekeeping is at stake."

The problem, says Haefeker, has a number of causes, one being the varroa mite, introduced from Asia, and another is the widespread practice in agriculture of spraying wildflowers with herbicides and practicing monoculture. Another possible cause, according to Haefeker, is the controversial and growing use of genetic engineering in agriculture.

As far back as 2005, Haefeker ended an article he contributed to the journal Der Kritischer Agrarbericht (Critical Agricultural Report) with an Albert Einstein quote: "If the bee disappeared off the surface of the globe then man would only have four years of life left. No more bees, no more pollination, no more plants, no more animals, no more man."

Mysterious events in recent months have suddenly made Einstein's apocalyptic vision seem all the more topical. For unknown reasons, bee populations throughout Germany are disappearing -- something that is so far only harming beekeepers. But the situation is different in the United States, where bees are dying in such dramatic numbers that the economic consequences could soon be dire. No one knows what is causing the bees to perish, but some experts believe that the large-scale use of genetically modified plants in the US could be a factor. Full Article

Top


ISU Dining Services Solicits Local Growers
March 2007
Iowa State University is steadily increasing the amount if local food it purchases for its dining facilities. In fact, Nancy Levandowski, director of ISU Dining, has developed a five-year plan that will increase local and regional specialty foods used by the college significantly. In a recent meeting hosted by the Leopold Center, Levandowski issued an invitation to some 30 farmers, ranchers and specialty processors from around the state who currently don’t supply the college with food, to become vendors. The invitation aims to help expand markets for Iowa farmers, as well as to provide healthy foods, protect the environment, and strengthen local economies. ISU Dining Services Solicits Local Growers Related ATTRA Publication: Bringing Local Food to Local People

Top


Web Site Service For Small Farms
March 2007
A new service, Small Farm Central, is working to provide web sites to small farms. The goal of Small Farm Central is to bridge the gap between rural food producers and urban consumers by allowing farmers to easily and cost-effectively set up their own farm web sites. Small Farm Central is a new company that assists small-scale farmers in marketing their farm and their products on the website. Website

Top


Collaborative Regional Alliance for Farmer Training (CRAFT) Releases 2006 Annual Report
March 2007
Collaborative Regional Alliance for Farmer Training (CRAFT) is a multi-year program of biodynamic and organic farmers and market gardeners whose mission is to strengthen a prospective farmer's awareness of the nature and requirements of farming and gardening. We now can point to ten new farm businesses created in 2006 with the help of the CRAFT network and seven others that are still in stages of development. It’s exciting to see that new farm entrepreneurs are now joining interns and employees in hands-on training through CRAFT mentors. We also have fourteen new farm families enrolled in the 2007 class of Stateline Farm Beginnings, further increasing our impact on local and regional food systems in southern Wisconsin and northern Illinois. Another development in 2006 included new partnerships with businesses interested in organic and sustainable agriculture. Donations and program involvement by those that purchase from our local farmers has also increased the profile of the CRAFT network and helped to include the supply chain within our regional training. Full ReportCollaborative Regional Alliance for Farmer Training 2006 Annual Report prepared by Angelic Organics Learning Center Margaret Nelson of Margie’s Grass Kickin’ Chickens Roscoe, IL
Angelic Organics Learning Center Farm Office: 1547 Rockton Rd, Caledonia, IL 61011 Tel: 815-389-8455 Urban Office: 6400 S Kimbark Ave, Chicago, IL 60637 Tel: 773-288-5462 Email: CRAFT@CSALearningCenter.org Web: www.learngrowconnect.org

Top


Blowing the whistle on sham 'organics'
2/15/2007Guest Opinion by Jacqueline Ostfeld

The organic food industry is booming.

In this country alone, sales have grown from $4 billion to $18 billion in 10 years. That sharp rise is largely because of increased public skepticism about the conventional food supply. Last year brimmed with food safety scares and scandals.

Now, with the impending market arrival of cloned animal products, consumer concerns about the wholesomeness of food are commonplace. The public is ripe for change - and big business is geared for the challenge. Nothing could have better symbolized organic food entry into the lives of mainstream America than when, last summer, Wal-Mart announced it would introduce organic products at affordable prices.

But is that really what consumers are getting?

As major retailers stock their shelves with "organic" products, underselling the existing industry, longtime organics advocates fear for standards. Cutting costs invites cutting corners.

Although the vast majority of organic farmers, ranchers and retailers follow legal standards, violations by the few, combined with inadequate oversight, threaten the integrity of the entire sector.

The allegations have begun. Horizon and Aurora, the country's two largest organic dairy producers, have been hit with a consumer boycott for confining their cows to feedlots rather than providing required access to pasture. Cows cramped in feedlots spend their lives wallowing in a mixture of mud and feces.

Studies show cows fattened on grass, rather than corn, are far less likely to harbor the dangerous and sometimes deadly strain of E. coli that continually threatens our food supply. Full Article

Federal Court Halts New Field Trials of Genetically Engineered Crops
February 2007
A federal district judge has ordered USDA to halt approval of all new field trials until more rigorous environmental reviews are conducted. Citing potential threats to the environment, Judge Harold Kennedy found in favor of the Center for Food Safety that USDA's past approvals of field trials of herbicide tolerant, genetically engineered bentgrass were illegal. The federal lawsuit was filed by the Center for Food Safety, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center, and others in 2003. The focus of the lawsuit are novel varieties of creeping bentgrass and Kentucky bluegrass manufactured by Scotts and Monsanto that have been genetically engineered to resist Roundup, Monsanto's popular herbicide. http://www.centerforfoodsafety.org/GTBC_DecisionPR_2_7_07.cfm

Top


Secretary Nilsestuen Announces Wisconsin Organic Agriculture Advisory Council
February 2007
“When Governor Doyle says ‘Grow Wisconsin Agriculture,’ a growing number of farms and agricultural businesses think organic,” Nilsestuen said. “Now is the time to position Wisconsin as the undisputed national leader in the growing and dynamic organic sector.” Wisconsin leads the nation in organic dairy production and boasts more than 700 certified organic farms and 150 businesses certified to process organic products. Members appointed to the council are:

• Michael Hansen, Organic Farmer, Milladore - Co-chair
• Harriet Behar, Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Services – co-chair
• Margaret Bert-Mittelstadt, Outpost Natural Foods Cooperative
• Paulette Bradley, Wisconsin Organic Marketing Association
• Tricia Bross, Organic Farmer, Rio
• David Engel, Organic Farmer, Soldiers Grove
• Rich Lange, Organic Farmer, Platteville
• Christine Mason, Standard Process, Inc.
• Jerry McGeorge, Organic Valley
• Jim Munsch, Organic Farmer, Coon Valley
• Bonnie Wideman, Midwest Organic Services Association
• Bob Wills, Cedar Grove Cheese

For more information, contact Laura Paine, DATCP Organic Agriculture Specialist, 608-224-5120. Press Release

Top


IFOAM Internet Training Platform Launched
February 2007
The IFOAM Internet Training Platform facilitates the search for valuable training materials and contact information on Organic Agriculture, and makes them available online. The Platform is contributing to the strengthening of Organic Agriculture worldwide by making quality information more accessible, and thereby filling existing knowledge gaps and improving capacity.

The Platform serves a broad spectrum of the Organic Agriculture community by connecting those who have relevant information resources, with those who seek them. We are constantly uploading new resources to the different sections of the Platform and have very recently removed the fees to submit resources. Materials are selected according to IFOAM selection criteria to ensure that users always find high quality materials and information.

As the Organic Agriculture movement grows worldwide, we hope our service will too. How can I help the Platform grow? There are many ways you can contribute to the Platform!

If you know of good training materials or training opportunities that should be in the Platform, let us know by contacting the Platform Coordinator! If your Organization wants to provide the Platform with training materials, announce training opportunities, or list their contact details at the Links & Addresses section, click here. If you have any comments and/or suggestions about the Platform and the resources it offers, please help us improve our service: Send feedback to the Platform Coordinator. Most importantly, spread the word!

The Platform intends to circulate quality Organic Agriculture information worldwide. The more people we can reach with this service, the closer we are to our goal. The Platform exists and grows thanks to your support. Thanks for sustaining the Platform and making the world more organic!!! Website

Top


Woodbury County Iowa offers tax breaks to organic farmers, first in U.S.
July 16, 2005, Associated Press SIOUX CITY, Iowa (AP), From Ag News You Can Use, Amigo Cantisano

Woodbury County is offering tax incentives to farmers who switch from conventional production to organic. Woodbury County Supervisors voted June 28 to provide property tax rebates for those who convert from conventional to organic farming practices. That action will grant $50,000 a year for five years to those who make the conversion.

Bob Scowcroft, executive director of the Organic Farming Research Foundation in Santa Cruz, Calif., said Woodbury County may be the first local government to offer such incentives to farmers" "Frankly, I don't know of any other activity that local government has taken to encourage organic farming,'' he said.

Marqusee said the goal of the program would be to build on local agriculture to spark economic development.

The program would help build a thriving organic farming industry that would attract organic food processors and other businesses to the area, he said. ``I studied the economic benefits of organic farming. It just seemed to fit,'' he said. ``We're looking at being part of a movement that is gaining ground.'' Marqusee said studies done by Iowa State University show organic farming can produce higher profit margins per acre than conventional farming, and on fewer acres.

Organic farming might save smaller family farms by offering lower startup costs and encouraging potential young farmers to stay in farming instead of leaving for higher paying jobs. Entire Article

Top


Announcing Directory of Minnesota Organic Farms
July 2006

This voluntary directory was produced by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) with funds provided by the USDA Risk Management Agency’s “Commodity Partnerships for Small Agricultural Risk Management Education Sessions” program. More than 200 of Minnesota’s estimated 500 certified organic farmers applied to be listed in this directory.

The Risk Management Agency (RMA) is part of the United States Department of Agriculture. RMA was created in 1996 to help farmers manage their business risks through effective, market-based risk management solutions. RMA promotes and regulates sound risk management solutions to improve the economic stability of American agriculture. RMA operates and manages the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC), which provides crop insurance to American producers through a network of private-sector partners. RMA also oversees the creation of new risk management tools and products, looks for ways to improve existing products, ensures the integrity of crop insurance programs; offers outreach programs to help ensure equal access and participation by underserved communities.The Agency also provides risk management education and information. For more information about RMA programs and services in Minnesota, call the regional office in St. Paul at 651-290- 3304. THE MDA DEVELOPED this directory to benefit organic farmers in Minnesota.

There are multiple ways to use it:
• To assess production and market opportunities, as well as areas of saturation. If a grower learns that every other organic farmer in his or her area is producing wheat for example, he/she may decide to diff erentiate by planting something else instead.
• To form their own production and/or marketing alliances. A grower may discover that four other growers within a 100-mile radius are planting organic blue corn. They may all wish to collaborate and negotiate as a group with buyers or shippers.
• To seek out advice and assistance. A grower interested in flax production might want to contact other organic flax growers listed in this directory. We also hope the directory will help buyers locate Minnesota organic farmers and that it will help agricultural professionals – including Extension educators and Department of Agriculture staff – identify clusters of similar organic growers who may need technical assistance or services.

To comment on this directory or to be listed in future editions call Meg Moynihan at the MDA, 651-201-6616. MDA Contact Meg Moynihan, Agriculture Diversification Specialist Meg.Moynihan@state.mn.us 651-201-6616 Agricultural Resources Management & Development Division Directory of Minnesota Organic Farms

Top


2006 CSA Farm Directory Available
May 2006

Now is the time to join a Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) farm. There are over two-dozen CSA farms serving the Twin Cities region alone. These farms sell "memberships," and in return farm members get a weekly delivery of fresh, organic produce into the fall. LSP's annual CSA directory is now available at http://www.landstewardshipproject.org/csa.html. If you'd like a free paper copy, call our White Bear Lake office at 651-653-0618. To hear a discussion on how CSA farming can bring farmers and consumers together, check out LSP's podcast page at http://www.landstewardshipproject.org/rss/podcast.php. Ear to the Ground No. 16 features an interview with two longtime CSA farmers. To learn how to subscribe to our free podcast service, see http://www.landstewardshipproject.org/podcast.html.

Top

Organic Agriculture in Wisconsin 2005 Status Report
February 2006

Wisconsin has a long tradition of national leadership in agriculture. While much of the University of Wisconsin’s focus, resources and research partnerships with agribusiness are grounded in large-scale production agriculture, there is a groundswell of support for alternative agriculture. Many innovative ideas in farming have gained legitimacy and market share in the food production arena. Diverse strategies, philosophies, practices and beliefs are represented: sustainable, grass-based, naturally-raised, antibiotic-free, etc. The Citizens Advisory Council of the UW-Madison Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems recognizes many approaches to improving access to quality, local/regional and sustainably grown food, including organic agriculture. We believe that organic practices may add value to any agricultural production plan, and strongly support agricultural systems that connect people to their food sources and hold growers accountable to their customers and communities for quality.

Organic agriculture in Wisconsin is a social movement, as well as a system of production practices. It has offered a meeting place and networking vehicle for people who want to embrace agricultural practices, resources and systems that provide public benefits such as pesticide reduction, improved soil quality, fair prices for farmers, mutually respectful relationships between growers and buyers, and social justice. The “Wisconsin Idea” of growing the organic movement has been grounded in these values. Full Report

Top


New Report Assesses World of Organic Agriculture
February 2006

The Research Institute of Organic Agriculture and the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) have recently released "The World of Organic Agriculture 2006 Statistics and Emerging Trends" . The report states that organic agriculture is practiced in almost all countries of the world According to the survey, currently more than 31 million hectares of farmland are under organic management worldwide, a gain of around five million hectares in a single year. A major increase of organic land has taken place in China, where nearly three million hectares of pastoral land were recently certified. In 2004, the market value of organic products worldwide reached 27.8 billion US$, (23.5 billion EUR), the largest share of organic products being marketed in Europe and North America. http://www.soel.de/oekolandbau/weltweit.html

Top


SARE Grants for Producers
December 2005

Since 1988, SARE has provided competitive grants for sustainable agriculture research and education through four regional administrative councils. Involving producers in SARE research projects has been a primary component of SARE-funded projects since the program’s inception.Recognizing that producer interest in sustainable agriculture research was growing, SARE’s North Central Region began directly funding farmers and ranchers in 1992. By 1995, each SARE region had begun to offer grant opportunities to producers. Now, farmers and ranchers can apply for grants that typically run between $500 and $15,000. http://www.sare.org/coreinfo/farmers.htm.

Top


Antibiotic Uptake by Plants from Soil Fertilized with Animal Manure
January 2005

Antibiotics are commonly added to animal feed as supplements to promote growth of food animals. However, absorption of antibiotics in the animal gut is not complete and as a result substantial amounts of antibiotics are excreted in urine and feces that end up in manure. Manure is used worldwide not only as a source of plant nutrients but also as a source of organic matter to improve soil quality especially in organic and sustainable agriculture. Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine whether or not plants grown in manure-applied soil absorb antibiotics present in manure. The test crops were corn (Zea mays L.), green onion (Allium cepa L.), and cabbage (Brassica oleracea L. Capitata group). All three crops absorbed chlortetracycline but not tylosin. The concentrations of chlortetracycline in plant tissues were small (2–17 ng g–1 fresh weight), but these concentrations increased with increasing amount of antibiotics present in the manure. This study points out the potential human health risks associated with consumption of fresh vegetables grown in soil amended with antibiotic laden manures. The risks may be higher for people who are allergic to antibiotics and there is also the possibility of enhanced antimicrobial resistance as a result of human consumption of these vegetables. from Journal of Environmental Equality

Top


New Report: Grower to Grower: Creating a Livelyhood on a Frest Market Vegetable Farm October 2005

Growing produce is not the biggest hurdle facing most fresh market vegetable growers; earning a reasonable living poses the greatest challenge. One way for farmers to analyze their operations in order to better meet their financial goals is to share information through farmer networks, conferences and coffee shop talk. Farmers may feel reluctant to share sensitive financial information, however. From 2002-2004, the Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems worked with a group of 19 growers on a participatory, farmer-led case study. The growers collected data on their sales, labor and other aspects of their businesses. They then created financial ratios that allowed them to compare small, medium and large operations in a way that respected their confidentiality. Their goal was not to provide a complete economic analysis of their operations, but to provide a basis for comparisons between farms and discussions of how to forge a quality livelihood from farming. Growers wanting a standard economic analysis of their farms can use traditional balance sheets, financial statements, and cash flow statements. The information contained in this case study can help guide growers as they set financial and quality of life goals for their farms and structure their operations to realize those goals. There is no ideal size for a fresh market vegetable farm; growers need to use their management skills and economic analysis tools to figure out the scale and level of mechanization that makes the most sense for them. Full Report

Top


Organic Farms Produce Same Yields as Conventional Farms
September 2005

Newswise: A review of a 22-year farming trial study concludes that organic farming produces the same yields of corn and soybeans as does conventional farming, but uses 30 percent less energy.

David Pimentel, a Cornell University professor of ecology and agriculture, states "Organic farming approaches for these crops not only use an average of 30 percent less fossil energy but also conserve more water in the soil, induce less erosion, maintain soil quality and conserve more biological resources than conventional farming does."

The study compared a conventional farm that used recommended fertilizer and pesticide applications with an organic animal-based farm (where manure was applied) and an organic legume-based farm (that used a three year rotation of hairy vetch/corn and rye/soybeans and wheat). The two organic systems received no chemical fertilizers or pesticides.

Pimentel noted that the organic corn yields were about one-third lower during the first four years of the study, but over time the organic systems produced higher yields, especially during drought conditions. The reason was that wind and water erosion degraded the soil on the conventional farm, while the soil on the organic farms steadily improved in organic matter, moisture, microbial activity and other soil quality indicators.

The study was funded by the Rodale Institute and included a review of current literature on organic and conventional agriculture comparisons. According to Pimentel, dozens of scientific papers reporting on research from the Rodale Institute Farming Systems Trial have been published in prestigious referred journals over the past 20 years. The study, authored by David Pimentel, is published in the July issue of Bioscience (vol. 55:7). http://www.newswise.com/articles/view/513110/

Top


Organic Industry Statistics & Projected Growth
September 2005

The organic industry is growing worldwide.This article from the New Farm gives detailed info about trends in the organic food. Click on the following link for the full article. Organic Industry Statistics

Top


The Organic Consumer Association's Stance on the Arthur Harvey Lawsuit and 2007 Farm Bill
8/31/2005 by Ronnie Cummins, Executive Director

Arthur Harvey versus USDA Lawsuit OCA and the other the plaintiffs in the Harvey lawsuit basically agree that:

Synthetics may be allowed in the “Made With” Organic ingredients category if there is no non-synthetic ingredient currently available, and if the synthetic ingredient is rigorously reviewed by the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB). Of course none of these synthetics can be derived from “excluded methods” such as genetic engineering or irradiation, as National Organic Program (NOP) regulations stipulate.

OCA is willing to consider the limited allowance of some synthetic substances for use in or on the non-organic portions of products labeled as “Organic” (those in the 95-100% Organic category). This will require a new rulemaking process by the USDA that improves and appropriately supports a thorough, carefully managed National Organic Standards Board process used to review and approve all synthetic substances proposed for use in organic food processing.

The synthetics originally approved by the NOSB were all supposed to be “sunsetted” after five years, and then re-reviewed. This never happened. OCA strongly believes that it is not a good idea to reopen the entire Organic Food Production Act (OFPA) for Congressional revisions at this time, but rather to use the USDA rulemaking process, whereby the organic community and the NOSB will propose rule changes to the USDA that are published in the Federal Register and then subjected to a full comment period of 90-180 days. Full Article

From Barn to Banquet Opportunities and Barriers to Greater Use of Minnesota Grown Food at Conferences
August 2005

In Minnesota, convention centers and hotels are host to a large number of local, regional, national and international conferences each year. In 2004, there were nearly 84,500 confirmed room nights for conventioneers staying in St. Paul hotels alone, according to the St. Paul Convention & Visitors Bureau (CVB).
However, very little Minnesota-grown food is used by the conference venues that participated in this research. Beyond wild rice and walleye, few venues highlight Minnesota foods on their menus. The menu choices made by conference organizers are driven largely by costconsciousness and risk aversion. Where local food has been used at a conference, it has usually been arranged on an “exception” basis by organizers willing to take on the legwork of designing special seasonally-appropriate menus, coordinating with farmers, organizing delivery and so on. On the whole, the conference market lags behind other foodservice markets like farm-to-school and farm-to-college where efforts to use local food are expanding and media attention is growing.
Nevertheless, there is growing demand for local food among key players in the conference world. For instance, 26% of the professional meeting planners who responded to the “Barn to Banquet” survey indicated that they would be “very interested” in having Minnesota-grown food or beverages at their conferences. An additional 66% said that they are “somewhat interested”. Even more importantly, several of the conference venues studied say that offering more Minnesota-grown foods would be of strategic benefit to their business. A lack of knowledge about what Minnesota agriculture has to offer and uncertainty about where to purchase local foods are key barriers to greater use of local foods by conference venues. Full Report

Top


WI Governor Supports Funding for Organic Specialist (August 2005)
WI Governor follows through with recommendations from the Organic Task Force for an organic specialist. The new state budget provides over $1 million for cost sharing for farmers to implement nutrient management planning. It also creates a new, full-time position in the agriculture department to encourage organic agriculture and intensive rotational grazing. See the full text of the Governors Comments.

Top


Price Premiums Hold as US Organic Market Expands (August 2005)
Price premiums for organic products have contributed to growth in certified organic farmland and, ultimately, market expansion. Fresh produce has long been an important component of the organic food sector, and a significant contributor to the organic industry's growth over the last decade. This article explores price premiums and market margins for a limited set of fresh produce items-carrots, broccoli, and mesclun mix. For the complete report, click on this link: Price Premiums PDF.

Top


Take a look at The Great News about Grass (June 2004)
Eating Fresh Publications presents a new 12-page color booklet, and find out why supporting grass-fed and pasture-raised foods is better for your health, the environment, wildlife, and animal and human welfare as well as a flavorful addition to our food system. Pasture-based farmers who sell direct, retailers, and organizations promoting sustainable farming are invited to obtain bulk numbers of The Great News about Grass for promotional purposes. Click here for pricing or send e-mail to info@eatingfresh.com for details. Booklet

Top


Minnesota Organic Hotline (September 2005)
A unique hotline offers practical information to beginning organic farmers. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) and the University fo Minnesota Southwest Research and Outreach Center (UM-SWROC) are pleased to anounce a resource hotline for beginning organic farmers in Minnesota. Minnesota Organic farmers' Information Exchange (MOFIE) is a group of 21 seasoned, certified organic Minnesoate growers who answer beginners' questions via telephone or email. These volunteer advisors have experience in a wide variety of organic production systems including cash grains, livestocka nd dairy, fruits and vegetables, and even maple syrup. They can answer questions about topics such as proper planting dates, variety selection, fertility, weed and disease control, conservation, marketing and certification. To keep the volume of calls managemable for these volunteers, they are only available to questions from Minnesota growers. Minnesotans can get copies of the mentor list free of charge at http://mofie.coafes.umn.edu or calling 570-752-7372

Top


Farm Program is Sown, but Will it Survive? Conservation Security Program (April 2004)
Applications for the new Conservation Security Program are due at the end of July. Seen as a innovative new way to support the farmers who are "doing things right", the program has been strangled by administration bureaucrats who write the rules. Full article from the July 22 New York Times.

Top


New Network Supports Sustainable Ag in Great Lakes Region (April 2004)
The New Agriculture Network, a collaboration between farmers, researchers and educators in three Great Lakes states, is a new online resource for sustainable and organic agriculture information. Nine organic farmers will share crop updates throughout the 2004 growing season, and Extension personnel from the University of Illinois, Purdue and Michigan State University will offer advice and provide biological farming information. Articles will be posted online in a bimonthly newsletter format. http://www.ipm.msu.edu/new-ag.htm

Top


Hotline for WI Health Insurance Co-op Set Up (January 2004)
A hotline for consumers interested in joining health care insurance purchasing cooperatives in Wisconsin has been established by the WI Federation of Cooperatives. The hotline will proved a way for consumers to obtain information on progress being made toward establishing cooperatives and the opportunity to register for a contact list. 608-258-4388. www.wfcmac.coop

Top


The Minnesota Dairy Initiative (MDI) (January 2004)
is a producer-led initiative to energize a healthy and vibrant dairy industry in Minnesota. The MN Sustainable Farming Association is a project partner, along with the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Minnesota Milk Producers Association, the University of Minnesota and Minnesota State Colleges and Universities. You can call Jeremy Lanctot, SFA's state-wide coordinator for more information, or ask him to come to your farm for a no-obligation assessment. The purpose of the assessment is to identify areas where you would like assistance to reduce costs, reduce labor, improve animal health, improve net profit, enhance quality of family life or protect the environment. Jeremy can discuss the options available for your individual farm. Often a first step is to link you with an experienced organic and/or grass-based farmer that can come to your farm to give
you an objective view of the entire farming operation. SFA also coordinates with six regional teams throughout Minnesota that offer a wide variety of skills and resources. Call or write: Jim Rook 25122 State Hwy 28 Glenwood, MN 56334 james.rook@ridgewater.edu Phone: (320) 239-1347 Fax: (320) 239-1360 http://www.mndairyinitiative.org/Web/AboutMDI.asp

Top


USDA Researcher Tracks Nitrate Buildup in Organic Farming (October 2003)
In California, a USDA researcher is studying the movement of nitrates in organic broccoli production, an attempt to assess nitrate buildup in both water and produce, reports the San Francisco Chronicle. Nitrate movement has been long studied in conventional agriculture, though only recently in the organic realm, largely due to insufficient funding. The three-year study examined nitrate buildup in and movement through the soil under six different organic fertilizer regimes and three different water treatments on test plots in Santa Cruz and the Central Valley. The study also measured levels of accumulated nitrates in the broccoli florets. Initial results have indicated that buildup in organic systems does occur, and researchers say they hope their work will help develop general guidelines for the two regions -- one wet and one dry -- for minimizing the nitrate effect from organic fertilization.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/10/25/HO216589.DTL

Top



Copyright - Midwest Organic and Sustainable Education Service